Toby Dickenson wrote in message ... >Not quite. Clients are only allowed to cache the ID for use with that >one object. DISPIDs are allowed to be different between instances of >one class, just not during the lifetime of one object. > >From what you have described (if I understand correctly) then you >should be ok???????? Yes - you are correct, and I believe this is indeed the problem. win32com needs to be fixed here. Thanks, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4