Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180911/d0441f3c/attachment.html below:
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Steven D'Aprano <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steve@pearwood.info" target="_blank">steve@pearwood.info</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">> That is about reproducible results, which is really a different thing than<br>
> the usual citations.<br>
<br>
</span>I don't think it is. I think you are seeing a distinction that is not <br>
there.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>no need for us to agree on that, but there are still multiple reasons / ways you might want to cite Python, and what you would want to cite would be different.</div><div><br></div><div>Lets say one were to write an article about how different computer languages express functional programming concepts -- you may want to cite Python, but you are not trying to identify a specific version for reproducible results.</div><div><br></div><div>And see Wes Turner's note -- it is highly unlikely that a single citation to a standard document or something will be enough for reproducibility anyway.</div><div><br></div><div>-CHB</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>Christopher Barker, Ph.D.<br>Oceanographer<br><br>Emergency Response Division<br>NOAA/NOS/OR&R Â Â Â Â Â Â (206) 526-6959Â Â voice<br>7600 Sand Point Way NE Â Â (206) 526-6329Â Â fax<br>Seattle, WA Â 98115 Â Â Â Â (206) 526-6317Â Â main reception<br><br><a href="mailto:Chris.Barker@noaa.gov" target="_blank">Chris.Barker@noaa.gov</a></div>
</div></div>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4