Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180227/556f0546/attachment.html below:
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/02/2018 19:08, Guido van Rossum
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7+vJLZAEStNVhopoas3AFKWsVmnMYC1Bc11dDZp-r59L0StA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">I would like to remind all wannabe language
designers that grammar design is not just solving puzzles. It's
also about keeping the overall feel of the language readable.
I'm getting the idea that none of the proposals discussed so far
(whether new syntax or clever use of existing syntax) satisfy
that constraint. Sometimes a for-loop is just better.<br
clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I don't know if you intended these remarks to include my proposal
(to allow "for VAR = EXPR"), as your message was posted only 27
minutes after mine.<br>
With respect, I honestly feel that this is a relatively small change
that makes the language *more* readable.<br>
<br>
Feel free, one and all, to tell me why I'm wrong.<br>
Best wishes,<br>
Rob Cliffe<br>
</body>
</html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4