Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171109/4857fd5d/attachment.html below:
<div dir="ltr">So... Åukasz?<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Nick Coghlan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ncoghlan@gmail.com" target="_blank">ncoghlan@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 10 November 2017 at 05:51, Guido van Rossum <<a href="mailto:guido@python.org">guido@python.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> If we have to change the name I'd vote for string_annotations -- "lazy" has<br>
> too many other connotations (e.g. it might cause people to think it's the<br>
> thunks). I find str_annotations too abbreviated, and stringify_annotations<br>
> is too hard to spell.<br>
<br>
</span>Aye, I'd be fine with "from __future__ import string_annotations" -<br>
that's even more explicitly self-documenting than either of my<br>
suggestions.<br></blockquote></div><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">--Guido van Rossum (<a href="http://python.org/~guido" target="_blank">python.org/~guido</a>)</div>
</div></div>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4