Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150404/ffc836eb/attachment.html below:
Le samedi 4 avril 2015, Ludovic Gasc <<a href="mailto:gmludo@gmail.com">gmludo@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">From a user's point of view, it should count for the total time, IMO.<br>
If people want a timeout for each syscall, they should call send()<br>
iteratively.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm agree with Antoine for a global timeout.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Â Ok, I also agree. I will modify sendall in Python 3.5 and suggest to loop on send to keep the same behaviour on timeout.</div><div><br></div>I don't want to change python 3.4 or 2.7, it would be strange to have a different behaviour in a minor python version.<div><br></div><div>Victor</div>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4