Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150311/fc12cda5/attachment.html below:
<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:49 PM Benjamin Peterson <<a href="mailto:benjamin@python.org">benjamin@python.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015, at 15:11, Brett Cannon wrote:<br>
><br>
> OK, but that doesn't influence the PEP's goal of dropping .pyo files.<br>
<br>
Correct.<br>
<br>
><br>
> Are you suggesting that the tag be changed to be less specific to<br>
> optimizations and more free-form? Like<br>
> `importlib.cpython-35.__no-<u></u>asserts_no-docstrings__.pyc`? Otherwise stuff<br>
> like this gets baked into the .pyc file itself instead of the file name,<br>
> but I don't think we should just drop the ability to switch off asserts<br>
> and<br>
> docstrings like Mark seemed to be suggesting.<br>
<br>
Basically, though the filename strings could perhaps be more compact.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I have a poll going on G+ to see what people think of the various proposed file name formats at <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BrettCannon/posts/fZynLNwHWGm">https://plus.google.com/u/0/+BrettCannon/posts/fZynLNwHWGm</a> . Feel free to vote if you have an opinion. </div></div></div>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4