Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150311/de67c248/attachment.html below:
<p dir="ltr"><br>
Le 11 mars 2015 18:29, "Brett Cannon" <<a href="mailto:brett@python.org">brett@python.org</a>> a écrit :<br>
> I'm going to propose a somewhat controversial idea: let's deprecate the ctypes module.</p>
<p dir="ltr">In the past I tried to deprecate many functions or modules because they are rarely or never used. Many developers prefered to keep them. By the way, I still want to remove plat-xxx modules like IN or CDROM :-)</p>
<p dir="ltr">Getopt was deprecated when optparse was added to the stdlib. Then optparse was deprecated when argparse was added to the stdlib.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cython and cffi are not part of the stdlib and can be hard to install on some platforms. Ctypes is cool because it doesn't require C headers nor a C compiler.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Is it possible to use cffi without a C compiler/headers as easily than ctypes?</p>
<p dir="ltr">If you want to move forward, you should help to integrate cffi into the stdlib. What's the status?</p>
<p dir="ltr">Victor</p>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4