Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140116/adef55dd/attachment-0001.html below:
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/16/2014 11:36 AM, Guido van
Rossum wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7+vJKh8x9vmDPjMYYeWd1nk4sLhZ3UDLunXrRbGGnmxRLtBQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Yury Selivanov
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:yselivanov.ml@gmail.com"><yselivanov.ml@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If we keep it strictly declarative, then, at least, well have this
possibility in the future.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Sounds like a pretty unlikely scenario. Why would you implement clinic in C?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
We'll never reimplement Argument Clinic in C. I could list many
reasons for this. Suffice to say, I'm not doing it, and I doubt
anyone else would ever step up to the plate and try it.<br>
<br>
And, "form follows function". It's a bad idea to limit Argument
Clinic's features today based on what might be inconvenient someday
in some hypothetical rewrite in C. Argument Clinic should be
maximally useful, right now.<br>
<br>
<br>
<i>/arry</i><br>
</body>
</html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4