Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130915/0b8d4b83/attachment-0001.html below:
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/14/2013 07:30 PM, Antoine Pitrou
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20130914123046.4f053e6a@fsol" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:33:56 +0900
Larry Hastings <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:larry@hastings.org"><larry@hastings.org></a> wrote:</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Whenever I read a discussion about the dict, I always wonder whether the
same thing applies to a set. Have you considered the utility of a
TransformSet? Or is it YAGNI?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Well, a TransformSet is like a normal dict, you just need to call the
transformation function yourself when inserting the keys.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
s/normal dict/normal set/<br>
<br>
But, then, a TransformDict is like a normal dict, you just need to
call the transformation function yourself when inserting the keys.
Yet a TransformDict is a useful enough concept that it is being
proposed for addition; I was wondering if a TransformSet would be
useful, too. But I suppose we should take baby steps here.<br>
<br>
<br>
<i>/arry</i><br>
</body>
</html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4