Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121003/1062ad75/attachment.html below:
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/03/2012 01:40 PM, Nick Coghlan
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADiSq7dQqsAZwyvh8fyn24gSs+5=-ZBKnbngpoRBUkymPxmEEg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Larry Hastings <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:larry@hastings.org"><larry@hastings.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">- 3.4.0 alpha 1: August 3, 2013
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Looks pretty good to me, but I'd still like to experiment with
bringing this one up a few months (say to April, a few weeks after
PyCon US 2013). I'm sure we can land enough interesting features
between now and then for people to be willing to tinker with it and
give us feedback :)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I don't agree. It's my understanding that the alphas are largely
ignored, and having them earlier would hardly make them more
relevant. I'm not saying "no"--but I'd definitely want to see more
people than just you clamoring for the early alphas before I agree
to anything.<br>
<br>
<br>
<i>/arry</i><br>
</body>
</html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4