Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091103/47d6f86a/attachment.htm below:
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Georg Brandl <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:g.brandl@gmx.net">g.brandl@gmx.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<a href="mailto:ssteinerX@gmail.com">ssteinerX@gmail.com</a> schrieb:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">><br>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Arc Riley wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> The main thing holding back the community are lazy and/or obstinate<br>
>> package maintainers. If they spent half the time they've put into<br>
>> complaining about Py3 into actually working to upgrade their code<br>
>> they'd be done now.<br>
><br>
> That's an inflammatory, defamatory, unsubstantiated, hyperbolic,<br>
> sweeping overgeneralization.<br>
<br>
</div></div>I know a few maintainers, and I have no problem seeing how Arc came<br>
to that conclusion.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Be that as it may, the only way python 3 will be widely adopted if people have motivation to (need to be compatible with other libs, pressure from users, their own interest in fostering python 3.0, etc.). Deriding them as "lazy" accomplishes nothing and obscures the fact that it is the python maintainers responsibility to bring about this motivation if they want python 3.0 to be adopted. No-one is going to convert to python 3.0 because you called them lazy.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Mike </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> </blockquote></div>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4