Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090911/c45a4984/attachment.htm below:
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:06, Cameron Simpson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cs@zip.com.au">cs@zip.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On 25Jul2009 10:25, Gregory P. Smith <<a href="mailto:greg@krypto.org">greg@krypto.org</a>> wrote:<br>
| On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Wouters<<a href="mailto:thomas@python.org">thomas@python.org</a>> wrote:<br>
| > So attached (and at <a href="http://codereview.appspot.com/96125/show" target="_blank">http://codereview.appspot.com/96125/show</a> ) is a<br>
| > preliminary fix, correcting the problem with os.fork(), os.forkpty() and<br>
| > os.fork1(). This doesn't expose a general API for C code to use, for two<br>
| > reasons: it's not easy, and I need this fix more than I need the API change<br>
| > :-) (I actually need this fix myself for Python 2.4, but it applies fairly<br>
| > cleanly.)<br>
|<br>
| This looks good to me.<br>
</div>[...]<br>
<br>
Where's this stand with respect to the upcoming Python 2.6.3?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Unless anyone speaks up, I'll submit the fix (without the change in semantics on AIX) to release26-maint early next week, so it would be in 2.6.3.</div>
</div><br>-- <br>Thomas Wouters <<a href="mailto:thomas@python.org">thomas@python.org</a>><br><br>Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!<br>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4