Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20061010/76a9e204/attachment-0001.html below:
Hello all,<br>I'd like to propose the following change to ConfigParser.py.<br>I won't call it a bug-fix because I don't know the relevant standards.<br>This change will enable multiline comments as follows:<br><br>[section]
<br>
item=value ;first of multiline comment<br>
;second of multiline comment<br>
<br>
Right now the behaviour is <br>
<br>
In [19]: cfg.get('section','item')<br>
Out[19]: 'value\n;second of multiline comment'<br>
<br>It's a one-line change.<br>RawConfigParser._read lines 434-437<br> # comment or blank line?<br>- if line.strip() == '' or line[0] in '#;':<br>+ if line.strip() == '' or line.strip()[0] in '#;':
<br> continue<br><br>Regards,<br>Greg Willden (Not a member of python-dev)<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Linux. Because rebooting is for adding hardware.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4