A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060630/ba2e1a7d/attachment.htm below:

On 6/30/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Frank Wierzbicki</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:fwierzbicki@gmail.com">fwierzbicki@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello all,<br><br>According to the thread that includes<br><a href="http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065727.html">http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065727.html</a><br>there will be some effort in 
2.6 to make the tests in Python more<br>consistent.&nbsp;&nbsp;I would like to help with that effort, partly to sneak in<br>some checks for CPython internal tests that should be excluded from<br>Jython, but mainly to understand the future implementation of Python
<br>for which the tests provide the only real spec.&nbsp;&nbsp;Which of the current<br>tests is closest to an &quot;ideal&quot; test, so I can use it as a model?</blockquote><div><br>We don't have any labeled as &quot;ideal&quot;.&nbsp; Either doctests or unittest tests are considered good form these days.&nbsp; Probably looking at the newer tests would be a good start.
<br><br>-Brett<br></div><br></div>

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4