A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-May/157752.html below:

[Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics

[Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semanticsSteven D'Aprano steve at pearwood.info
Tue May 28 06:03:09 EDT 2019
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:37:17AM +0100, Paul Moore wrote:

> Of course, all of this is only if we have decided to formalise the
> semantics and change CPython to conform. I've never personally been
> affected by any of the edge cases with locals(), so on a purely
> personal basis, I'm equally happy with "do nothing" :-)

I don't think "Do Nothing" is a good option, because (as I understand 
it) the status quo has some weird bugs when you have tracing functions 
written in Python (but not in C?). So something has to change, one way 
or another. Hence Nick's PEP.


-- 
Steven
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4