A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2019-January/156064.html below:

[Python-Dev] ctypes: is it intentional that id() is the only way to get the address of an object?

[Python-Dev] ctypes: is it intentional that id() is the only way to get the address of an object? [Python-Dev] ctypes: is it intentional that id() is the only way to get the address of an object?Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Fri Jan 18 05:55:35 EST 2019
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:18:17 -0800
Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 22:11 Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org wrote:
> 
> > For everyone who managed to reply *hours* after Eryk Sun posted the
> > correct answer and still get it wrong, here it is again in full.
> >
> > As a bonus, here's a link to the place where this answer appears in the
> > documentation:
> > https://docs.python.org/3/library/ctypes.html#ctypes.py_object  
> 
> 
> Eryk's answer is actually much more useful than the documentation. I've
> read that documentation many times, but always decided not to use py_object
> because I couldn't figure out what it would actually do...

+1

Needless to say, this is an opportunity to improve the documentation ;-)

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4