> On 3 Oct 2018, at 15:51, INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2018年10月3日(水) 21:24 Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer at ugent.be <mailto:J.Demeyer at ugent.be>>: > Hello, > > > I am well aware of the current governance issues, but several people > have mentioned that the BDFL-Delegate process can still continue for > now. > > Really? > I don't know process to assign BDFL-delegate without BDFL. My understand is that accepting *any* PEP by anyone is out of the question until the governance situation gets resolved. That's the only reason why PEP 544 is not yet accepted for example. - Ł -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20181003/a29cde26/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20181003/a29cde26/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4