Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote: > Using this assigned result elsewhere in the same expression (akin to > regex backreferences) is not a part of the basic idea actually. If that's true, then the proposal has mutated into something that has *no* overlap whatsoever with the use case that started this whole discussion, which was about binding a temporary variable in a comprehension, for use *within* the comprehension. > It depends on the evaluation order (and whether something is evaluated > at all), Which to my mind is yet another reason not to like ":=". -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4