On Sep 10, 2017, at 13:46, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: >> For PEP 553, I think it’s a good idea to support the environment variable $PYTHONBREAKPOINT[*] but I’m stuck on a design question, so I’d like to get some feedback. >> >> Should $PYTHONBREAKPOINT be consulted in breakpoint() or in sys.breakpointhook()? > > Wouldn't the usual pattern be to check $PYTHONBREAKPOINT once at > startup, and if it's set use it to initialize sys.breakpointhook()? > Compare to, say, $PYTHONPATH. Perhaps, but what would be the visible effects of that? I.e. what would that buy you? Cheers, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170911/fb67af00/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4