RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 7 17:19:35 EDT 2017 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149320.html

Nice one.

It would be nice to specify the various APIs needed as well.

Why do you keep the mtime-based format as an option? (Maybe because it's
faster? Did you measure it?)

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>
wrote:

> Hello,
> I've written a short PEP about an import extension to allow pycs to be
> more deterministic by optional replacing the timestamp with a hash of
> the source file: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/
>
> Thanks for reading,
> Benjamin
>
> P.S. I came up with the idea for this PEP while awake.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> guido%40python.org
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170907/4ee1efc7/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149320.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 552: deterministic pycs