On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > PEP 550 treats coroutines and generators as objects that support out > of order execution. Out of order? More like interleaved. > PEP 555 still doesn't clearly explain how exactly it is different from > PEP 550. Because 555 was posted *after* 550, I think that it's PEP > 555 that should have that comparison. > 555 was *posted* as a pep after 550, yes. And yes, there could be a comparison, especially now that PEP 550 semantics seem to have converged, so PEP 555 does not have to adapt the comparison to PEP 550 changes. -- Koos -- + Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven + -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170906/6797a02d/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4