RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 6 13:50:11 EDT 2017 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149233.html

I think this is useful as it can make porting easier. I am using it in my
attempts to cross compile CPython to WebAssembly (since WebAssembly in its
MVP does not support threading).

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

>
> I made an experimental PR to remove support for threads-less builds:
> https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3385
>
> The next effect is to remove almost 2000 lines of code (including many
> #ifdef sections in C code).
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:36:51 +0200
> Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It's 2017 and we are still allowing people to compile CPython without
> > threads support.  It adds some complication in several places
> > (including delicate parts of our internal C code) without a clear
> > benefit.  Do people still need this?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> ethan%40ethanhs.me
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170906/93021c2e/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149233.html below:

[Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?