elif break and elif None: I'd like that very much. It's weird a break the semantic of break and None, but it's in such a dark corner of Python anyway I don't bother. Le 27/07/2017 à 21:19, MRAB a écrit : > On 2017-07-27 03:34, Mike Miller wrote: >> >> >> On 2017-07-26 16:36, MRAB wrote: >>> "nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't. >> >> Whenever I've used the for-else, I've put a # no-break right next to >> it, to >> remind myself as much as anyone else. >> >> for...: not break: is the best alternative I've yet seen, congrats. >> Perhaps in >> Python 5 it can be enabled, with for-else: used instead for empty >> iterables, as >> that's what I expected the first few dozen times. >> > For empty iterables, how about "elif None:"? :-) > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/desmoulinmichel%40gmail.com >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4