A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-January/147171.html below:

[Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?

[Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules? [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?Larry Hastings larry at hastings.org
Tue Jan 17 19:59:33 EST 2017
On 01/17/2017 04:48 PM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Larry Hastings<larry at hastings.org>  wrote:
>> While that's a reasonable policy, unless we have a way to automatically
>> detect that I suspect C99 stuff will creep into the header files and break
>> the non-C99 customers.  Maybe we could get some sort of buildbot that
>> exercises this scenario?
>>
> How about `gcc -ansi` ?

That seems like it should work fine.  Perhaps we could even add this gcc 
-ansi step to the normal Python build process.  It shouldn't take very 
long, so it wouldn't slow down the build very much, and since most 
Python development happens on UNIX platforms (I think) this would help 
prevent more C99 constructs from creeping into the header files.


//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170117/81a326df/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4