RetroSearch Browse

Mon Oct 3 13:41:23 EDT 2016 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-October/146585.html

But they most certainly are documented! So Skip's point is valid.
MvL's suggestion for how to evolve this API is still the best IMO.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
<alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Why didn't these flags
>> (and the T_* flags in structmember.h) get swept up in all the hubbub
>> around the grand renaming.
>
>
> Note that structmember.h is semi-private - it is not included in Python.h.
> See discussion at <http://bugs.python.org/issue2897>.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-October/146585.html below:

[Python-Dev] Missing PY_ prefixes in structmember.h