RetroSearch Browse

Fri May 27 11:37:48 EDT 2016 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-May/144736.html

On 05/27/2016 11:31 AM, Daniel Holth wrote:
 >
> BLAKE2 is important, since it removes the last objection to replacing MD5 -
> speed - that has made it hard for cryptography fans to convince MD5 users
> to upgrade.
>

I have had to stick to MD5 for performance reasons (2 seconds in MD5 or 
9.6 seconds in SHA256, IIRC) in scenarios that did not require an SHA*. 
Having BLAKE2 around wouldn't be a necessity, but if it shipped with 
newer versions of Python eventually there would be a commit switching 
the underlying hash function.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-May/144736.html below:

[Python-Dev] New hash algorithms: SHA3, SHAKE, BLAKE2, truncated SHA512