A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-January/142777.html below:

[Python-Dev] Update PEP 7 to require curly braces in C

[Python-Dev] Update PEP 7 to require curly braces in C [Python-Dev] Update PEP 7 to require curly braces in CGreg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Mon Jan 18 23:27:21 EST 2016
Brett Cannon wrote:
> For me, I don't see how::
> 
>   if (x != 10)
>     return NULL;
>   do_some_more();
> 
> is any clearer or more readable than::
> 
>   if (x != 10) {
>     return NULL;
>   }
>   do_some_more();

Maybe not for that piece of code on its own, but the version
with braces takes up one more line. Put a few of those together,
and you can't fit as much code on the screen. If it makes the
difference between being able to see e.g. the whole of a loop
at once vs. having to scroll up and down, it could make the
code as a whole harder to read.

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4