On 1/18/2016 6:20 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 at 11:10 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org > <mailto:brett at python.org>> wrote: > > While doing a review of http://bugs.python.org/review/26129/ I asked > to have curly braces put around all `if` statement bodies. Serhiy > pointed out that PEP 7 says curly braces are optional: > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0007/#id5. I would like to > change that. > > My argument is to require them to prevent bugs like the one Apple > made with OpenSSL about two years ago: > https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/02/22/applebug.html. Skipping > the curly braces is purely an aesthetic thing while leaving them out > can lead to actual bugs. > > Anyone object if I update PEP 7 to remove the optionality of curly > braces in PEP 7? > > > Currently this thread stands at: > > +1 > Brett > Ethan > Robert > Georg > Nick > Maciej Szulik > +0 > Guido > -0 > Serhiy > MAL > -1 > Victor (maybe; didn't specifically vote) > Larry > Stefan Though I don't write C anymore, I occasionally read our C sources. I dislike mixed bracketing in a multiple clause if/else statement, and would strongly recommend against that. On the other hand, to my Python-trained eye, brackets for one line clauses are just noise. +-0. If coverity's scan does not flag the sort of misleading bug bait formatting that at least partly prompted this thread if (a): b; c; then I think we should find or write something that does and run it over existing code as well as patches. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4