A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-February/143322.html below:

[Python-Dev] Duelling PEPs not needed [was: PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals]

[Python-Dev] Duelling PEPs not needed [was: PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals] [Python-Dev] Duelling PEPs not needed [was: PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals]Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Feb 11 22:17:32 EST 2016
Serhiy Storchaka writes:

 > I suspect that my arguments can be lost [without a competing PEP].

Send Georg a patch for his PEP, that's where they belong, since only
one of the two PEPs could be approved, and they would be 95% the same
otherwise.  If he doesn't apply it (he's allowed to move it to the
"rejected arguments" section, though), or the decision silently goes
against you, speak up then -- that would be a problem IMO.

Or you could offer to BD1P!  (If you're selected, I hope you change
your mind! :-)



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4