A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-October/141918.html below:

[Python-Dev] under what circumstances can python still exhibit "high water mark" memory usage?

[Python-Dev] under what circumstances can python still exhibit "high water mark" memory usage? [Python-Dev] under what circumstances can python still exhibit "high water mark" memory usage?Stefan Ring stefanrin at gmail.com
Wed Oct 14 11:04:24 EDT 2015
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Chris Withers <chris at simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm having trouble with some python processes that are using 3GB+ of memory
> but when I inspect them with either heapy or meliae, injected via pyrasite,
> those tools only report total memory usage to be 119Mb.
>
> This feels like the old "python high water mark" problem, but I thought that
> was fixed in 2.6/3.0?
> Under what circumstances can a Python process still exhibit high memory
> usage that tools like heapy don't know about?

Which Python version are you experiencing this with? I know that in
Python 2.7, having many floats (and I think also ints) active at once
creates a high water situation. Python 2.7 is what I have experience
with -- with heap sizes around 40 GB sometimes.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4