On May 27, 2015 at 4:18:11 AM, Antoine Pitrou (solipsis at pitrou.net) wrote: On Mon, 25 May 2015 17:30:02 -0700 Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > > So, in all three cases it's work that's been under development for a > while. These people did this work out of the kindness of their hearts, > to make Python better. As a community we want to encourage that and > make sure these developers know we appreciate their efforts. These > people would be happier if the work shipped in 3.5 as opposed to 3.6 so > it got into user's hands sooner. I second that sentiment. But it strikes me that we're doing this because our release frequency is completely inadapted. If we had feature releases, say, every 6 or 9 months, the problem wouldn't really exist in the first place. Exceptions granted by the RM only tackle a very small portion of the problem, because the long delay before an accepted patch being in an official release *still* frustrates everyone, and the unpredictability of exceptions only makes things *more* frustrating for most players. Of course, it was pretty much shut down before: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115619.html Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/donald%40stufft.io I’m in favor of releasing more often as well. --- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150527/e3302033/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4