On 8 August 2015 at 11:39, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com> wrote: > Following a long discussion on python-ideas, I've posted my draft of > PEP-498. It describes the "f-string" approach that was the subject of > the "Briefer string format" thread. I'm open to a better title than > "Literal String Formatting". > > I need to add some text to the discussion section, but I think it's in > reasonable shape. I have a fully working implementation that I'll get > around to posting somewhere this weekend. > > >>> def how_awesome(): return 'very' > ... > >>> f'f-strings are {how_awesome()} awesome!' > 'f-strings are very awesome!' > > I'm open to any suggestions to improve the PEP. Thanks for your feedback. > I'd like to see an alternatives section, in particular listing alternative prefixes and why they weren't chosen over f. Off the top of my head, ones I've seen listed are: ! $ Tim Delaney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150809/b714b24c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4