RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 20 21:37:57 CEST 2015 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139240.html

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Paul Moore wrote:

> On 20 April 2015 at 19:41, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>>> tldr; type hints in python source are scary. Would reserving them for stub
>>> files be better?
>>
>> I think so.  I think PEP 8 should require stub files for stdlib modules and
>> strongly encourage them for 3rd party code.
>
> Agreed. I have many of the same concerns as Harry, but I wouldn't have
> expressed them quite as well. I'm not too worried about actually
> removing annotations from the core language, but I agree that we
> should create a strong culture of "type hints go in stub files" to
> keep source files readable and clean.
>
> On that note, I'm not sure "stub" files is a particularly good name.
> Maybe "type files" would be better? Something that emphasises that
> they are the correct place to put type hints, not a workaround.

How about "header" files?

(ducks...)

Isaac Morland           CSCF Web Guru
DC 2619, x36650         WWW Software Specialist

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139240.html below:

[Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction