On Apr 19, 2015, at 01:19 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
>We should rename "types" to "accept". "accept" should takes a set of types;
>these types specify the types of Python objects the Clinic parameter should
>accept. For the funny pseudo-types needed in some Clinic declarations
>("buffer", "robuffer", and "rwbuffer"), Clinic provides empty class
>declarations so these behave like types too.
Having only followed the AC discussions tangentially, I have to say that the
above suggestion and the given examples make a lot more intuitive sense to me.
I had the same initial thought as Glenn regarding type annotations. It's fine
that they're separate concepts, but it's also helpful that Larry's suggestion
above seems to align them better.
Cheers,
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4