RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 3 12:58:07 CEST 2015 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139000.html

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:56:53AM -0700, Larry Hastings wrote:
> So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care
> about GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files?  Or do you not care?

Developer using python on windows here. I care, yes.

It's valuable and significant to be able to authenticate the files on different
platforms (your GnuPG advantage #1), and using the same tools.  It's also
useful to have a very mature tool to do that.  And valuable that all files can
be so validated, not just the .exes.

> //arry/

Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150403/b243387f/attachment.sig>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-April/139000.html below:

[Python-Dev] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?