"python" should always be the same as "python2". On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:41:58AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Donald Stufft wrote: > > > > >My biggest problem with ``python3``, is what happens after 3.9. > > > > FWIW, 3.9 by my rough calculation is 7 years away. > > That makes it 2021, one year after Python 2.7 free support ends, but two > years before Red Hat commercial support for it ends. > > > I seem to recall Guido saying that *if* there's a 4.0, it won't be a > major > > break like Python 3, whatever that says about the numbering scheme after > 3.9. > > > > Is 7 years enough to eradicate Python 2 the way we did for Python 1? > Then > > maybe Python 4 can reclaim /usr/bin/python. > > I expect not quite. Perhaps 10 years though. > > > > -- > Steven > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140919/1ecb9632/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4