On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:46:03 +0100 Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > I assume it's based on the concepts of slicing. From the docs > "s.insert(i, x) - inserts x into s at the index given by i (same as > s[i:i] = [x])". Although shouldn't that read s[i:i+1] = [x] ? No, the latter would replace the contents at index i, while the former inserts it (formally, it replaces the 0-length slice with a 1-length slice). Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4