As of today I still am getting untrusted cert thought I would re-ping to see if there is an ETA. On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > On 8/21/2014 7:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> >> On 22 Aug 2014 04:45, "Benjamin Peterson" <benjamin at python.org >> <mailto:benjamin at python.org>> wrote: >> > >> > Perhaps some board members could comment, but I hope the PSF could just >> > pay a few hundred a year for a proper certificate. >> >> That's exactly what we're doing - MAL reminded me we reached the same >> conclusion last time this came up, we'll just track it better this time >> to make sure it doesn't slip through the cracks again. >> >> (And yes, switching to forced HTTPS once this is addressed would also be >> a good idea - we'll add it to the list) >> > > I just switched from a 'low variety' short password of the sort almost > crackable with brute force (today, though not several years ago) to a > higher variety longer password. People with admin privileges on the tracker > might be reminded to recheck. What was adequate 10 years ago is not so now. > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/gokoproject%40gmail.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140901/d91eb392/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4