On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:47:58 -0800 Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > > Another issue is that it breaks the way I and others have taught for years that generators are a kind of iterator (an object implementing the iterator protocol) and that a primary motivation for generators is to provide a simpler and more direct way of creating iterators. However, Chris explained that, "This proposal causes a separation of generators and iterators, so it's no longer possible to pretend that they're the same thing." That is a major and worrisome conceptual shift. I agree with Raymond on this point. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4