RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 28 17:39:45 CET 2014 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133669.html

On 28 March 2014 16:22, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 12:18 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> I'm mostly arguing the FLOSS project should feel free to ignore
>> high-maintenance-cost commercial concerns until those concerns bring
>> either blook (funded developer time) or treasure (pooled to pay for
>> the same time) to the table to pay for them.
>
> Dangit,
>
>  s/blook/blood/

Rats. I thought I'd just learned a new word. Regardless of reality, I
think "blook" should be a real word :-)

Paul

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133669.html below:

[Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree