RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 26 00:14:02 CET 2014 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133498.html

On 26 Mar 2014 08:22, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On core-mentorship someone asked about PEP 3145 - Asynchronous I/O for
> subprocess.popen.  I answered that asyncio now has subprocess support
> (including non-blocking I/O on the three standard stream pipes), so
> it's not obvious anything else is needed.
>
> Should we change the PEP's status to Rejected or Superseded?

Yes. I think we'd typically use Rejected in this case, as Superseded
normally relates to the evolution of interface definition PEPs.

Cheers,
Nick.

>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140326/c056f6cb/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133498.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of PEP 3145