They detect for ssl to have the SSLContext and use it if it's available. > On Mar 22, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 22 March 2014 23:49, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote: >> In the case of requests they already have an optional dependency on >> pyopenssl. It's just many people either don't know they should use it, are >> unable to use it, or unwilling to use the python packaging tool chain >> because of its current flaws. > > Do they use the new features in the Python 3.x ssl module when it's > available to give the same level of security as having pyopenssl > would, or do they use a "lowest common denominator" (i.e., 2.x > compatible) level of security when using the stdlib? If the latter, > that would be very, very sad. > > Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4