A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133116.html below:

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Requesting pronouncement on PEP 463: Exception-catching expressions

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Requesting pronouncement on PEP 463: Exception-catching expressionsJeremy Kloth jeremy.kloth at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 17:29:20 CET 2014
[resending to list]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jeremy Kloth <jeremy.kloth at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Requesting pronouncement on PEP 463:
Exception-catching expressions
To: Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com>


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tooling issues should already have been solved for lambda, but if you
> don't like the colon, go with one of the other options - Brett
> expressed support for 'then', which makes very good sense (it does
> require creating a new keyword, but it's a fairly safe one).

Just to note, if a token is desired, it could be treated as a
pseudo-keyword much like 'as' was prior to 2.6 (or 2.5 with future
'with_statement').  That is, it is only treated as a keyword when
parsing the expression defining its use.

With that, the list of available "keywords" becomes much broader.

-- 
Jeremy Kloth
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4