On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:09 AM, Martin v. Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> >> * Should we make use of the potential breakage with 2.7.10 >> to introduce a new Windows compiler version for Python 2.7 ? > > Assuming it is a good idea to continue producing Windows binaries > for 2.7, I think it would be a bad idea to switch compilers. It will > cause severe breakage of 2.7 installations, much more problematic > than switching to two-digit version numbers. I agree with this, we’ve just finally started getting things to the point where it makes a lot of sense for binary distributions for Windows. Breaking all of them on 2.7 would be very bad. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140623/13141f96/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4