Le 22/07/2014 17:44, Nick Coghlan a écrit : > > > > > As for 2.x, I don't see why you couldn't just continue using a strong > reference. > > As Antoine says, if the cycle already exists in Python 2 (and it sounds > like it does), we can just skip backporting the weak reference change. No, IIRC there shouldn't be a cycle. It's just complicated in a different way than 3.x :-) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4