Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/132103.html below:

[Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

26.01.14 19:00, Vajrasky Kok написав(ла):
> So I hope my argument is convincing enough. We need to fix this bug in
> Python 2.7, 3.3, and 3.4, by making `times` argument sent via
> positional or keyword in itertools.repeat ALWAYS means the same thing,
> which is 0 repetitions.
>
> If this is not possible, at the very least, we need to warn this
> behaviour in the doc.

I agree with Vajrasky. This is obvious bug and it should be fixed in any 
way.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4