A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131590.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 461 - Adding % and {} formatting to bytes

[Python-Dev] PEP 461 - Adding % and {} formatting to bytes [Python-Dev] PEP 461 - Adding % and {} formatting to bytesGlenn Linderman v+python at g.nevcal.com
Wed Jan 15 02:02:17 CET 2014
On 1/14/2014 2:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> I think Brett has the right idea: we shouldn't try to accept numbers 
> for %s in binary interpolation. If we limit it to just buffer 
> exporters and objects with a __bytes__ method then the problem goes away.
>
> The numeric codes all exist in Python 2, so the porting requirement to 
> the common 2/3 subset will be to update the cases of binary 
> interpolation of a number with %s to use an appropriate numeric 
> formatting code instead.
>
+1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140114/b1bf2b6c/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4