On 1/14/2014 2:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > I think Brett has the right idea: we shouldn't try to accept numbers > for %s in binary interpolation. If we limit it to just buffer > exporters and objects with a __bytes__ method then the problem goes away. > > The numeric codes all exist in Python 2, so the porting requirement to > the common 2/3 subset will be to update the cases of binary > interpolation of a number with %s to use an appropriate numeric > formatting code instead. > +1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140114/b1bf2b6c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4