I think of PEP 460 as the strict version and PEP 461 as the lenient version. I don't think it makes sense to have more variants. So please collaborate with whichever you like best. :-) On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 01/14/2014 01:05 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: >> >>> This PEP goes a but further than PEP 460 does, and hopefully spells >>> things out in enough detail so there is no confusion as to what is >>> meant. >> >> >> Are we going down the PEP route with the various ideas? Guido, do >> you want one from me as well or should I not bother? > > > While I can't answer for Guido, I will say I authored this PEP because > Antoine didn't want 460 to be any more liberal than it already was. > > If you collect your ideas together, I'll add them to 461 as questions or > discussions or however is appropriate (assuming you're willing to go that > route). > > -- > ~Ethan~ -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4