On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:51:41 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 January 2014 04:38, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > > But! Our goal should be to help people convert to Python3. So how can > > we find out what the specific problems are that real-world programs are > > facing, look at the *actual code*, and help that project figure out the > > best way to make that code work in both python2 and python3? > > > > That seems like the best way to find out what needs to be added to > > python3 or pypi: help port the actual code of the developers who are > > running into problems. > > > > Yes, I'm volunteering to help with this, though of course I can't promise > > exactly how much time I'll have available. > > And, as has been the case for a long time, the PSF stands ready to > help with funding credible grant proposals for Python 3 porting > efforts. I believe some of the core devs (including David?) do > freelance and contract work, so that's an option definitely worth > considered if a project would like to support Python 3, but are having > difficulty getting their with purely volunteer effort. Yes, I do contract programming, as part of Murray and Walker, Inc (web site coming soon but not there yet). And yes I currently have time available in my schedule. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4