A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/134397.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 2.7.7. on Windows

[Python-Dev] Python 2.7.7. on Windows [Python-Dev] Python 2.7.7. on WindowsGlenn Linderman v+python at g.nevcal.com
Tue Apr 29 06:15:57 CEST 2014
On 4/28/2014 8:52 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I think that's unfair. I'm not a MS fan, not even close. I think their
> business practices in the past have been reprehensible. But if there is
> anyone who takes backwards-compatibility even more seriously than
> Python-Dev, it is them.
I guess there is no one who takes backwards-compatibility even more 
seriously than Python-Dev.

I have perfectly good DOS and Windows programs that no longer run on 
supported Windows versions. XP->Vista was a bigger break than Python 
2->3, from my perspective.

And then if you get into the command line programs that have vanished or 
take different options, breaking batch files, and similar facilities, it 
gets even worse.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140428/fe664d34/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4